Let me just preface this article by saying that if
you aren’t on the Joe Flacco bandwagon yet, you might as well hop aboard now.
Joe’s going to be our starting quarterback for a long, long time. Those of you
who refuse to embrace that fact are destined for a maddening decade-plus of
Baltimore football. (To our fanatics with masochistic tendencies—I know you’re
out there; I’ve heard you calling local sports talk radio—you may disregard
this warning).
I digress.
The agents for Joe Flacco and Ray Rice are in the
thick of contract negotiations with general manager Ozzie Newsome and chief
financial officer Pat Moriarty. Both Joe and Ray have far outplayed their
initial rookie contracts, and both have earned a substantial payday.
We have a problem that a majority of teams around
the league wish they had. We draft entirely too well. The situation with Joe
and Ray is a direct result of Ozzie finding the two guideposts for our offense
in the same draft, and now we have to pay for it.
Here are the contracts that Flacco and Rice have
been taking us to the playoffs under for the last few years:
Joe Flacco— 5 years, $30 million
2011: $4.485 million
2012: $6.76 million (plus $2.1 million Flacco
earned in incentives)
2013: Free Agent
- 4 straight playoff appearances
- 2 AFC Championship games
- QB record for wins in first 4 seasons
- Career 61% completion percentage
- Career 80 TD/ 46 INT
- Career 215 yds/ game
Ray Rice— 4 years, $2.8 million
2010: $470,000
2011: $555,000
2012: $7.7 million (this is the franchise tag
number—a one-year guarantee that is the bane of every NFL star’s existence)
To give you a frame of reference, I’m listing a
few other quarterback and running back contracts from around the league for
players comparable (and often less valuable, in my opinion) to Flacco and Rice.
QUARTERBACKS:
Philip Rivers— 7 years, $98.25 million
2012: $10.2 million
2013: $12 million
- One postseason appearance (Loss to the Jets) since 2008
Tony Romo— 6 years, $67.4 million
2012: $9 million
2013: $11.5 million
- Impressive career regular season stats:
- 64.5% completion percentage
- 149 TD/ 72 INT
- However, only one playoff appearance, one win since 2008
- Injuries in 2008 and 2010; sat out significant number of games in those two years
Matt Schaub— 6 years, $48 million
2012: $ 7.15
2013: Free Agent
- No postseason appearances since 2008
- Injuries in 2010 and 2011 seasons showing downward trend
Matt Cassel— $62 million
2012: $7.15 million
2013: Free Agent
- One postseason appearance since 2008 (Loss to the Ravens)
- Career 59% completion percentage
- Career average 169 yds passing/ game
Mark Sanchez— 5 years, $58.25 million
2012: $3.25 million
2013: $8.25 million
2014: $9 million
2015: $12.5 million
- 6 postseason games (4-2) since 2009
- Career 55.3% completion percentage
- Career 55 TD/ 51 INT
Kevin Kolb— 5 years, $63 million
2011: $4 million
2012: $10 million
2013: $13 million
2012: $10 million
2013: $13 million
- 28 total starts
- Career 59.4% completion percentage
- Career 144 average yds/ game
- Career 20 TD/ 22 INT
RUNNING BACKS:
Arian Foster— 5 years, $43.5 million; $8.7 million/ year
Chris Johnson— 6 years, $55.26 million; $9.21 million/ year
Adrian Peterson— 7 years, $96 million; $13.7 million/ year
Marshawn Lynch— $31 million; $7.75 million/ year
Murice Jones-Drew— 5 years, 30.95 million; $6.19 million/ year
Steven Jackson— 6 years, $44.8 million; $7.46 million/ year
Darren McFadden— 6 years, $60 million; $10 million/ year
Michael Turner— 6 years, $34.5 million ; $5.75 million
DeAngelo Williams— 5 years, $43 million ; $8.6 million/ year
Among comparable quarterbacks, only Tony Romo and
Philip Rivers could make an argument for being a better all-around quarterback,
but between them they have two postseason appearances and one win in four
years. Obviously, football is a team sport but I’d rather have a bunch of
playoff wins attached to my quarterback’s name than impressive regular season
performances and nothing to show for it. Sanchez is, of course, on the other
end of the spectrum, having impressive postseason results but showing very
little that would indicate he has a very high ceiling as a reliable signal-caller.
As far as
running backs are concerned, we’ve all witnessed Ray Rice become an utter
superstar over the last four seasons. It would be easy to make the argument
that he’s the best in the game right now—he led the league in yards from
scrimmage with 2,068 yds and posted 12 total touchdowns receiving and rushing
(and one passing!) last season.
Since his rookie year (2008), Rice has logged a
staggering 6,612 regular-season yards from scrimmage, 30 touchdowns and has
only fumbled six times in 61 games. Even more impressive is the fact that he
amassed those numbers despite playing second fiddle to Willis McGahee in 2008;
Rice didn’t score his first touchdown as a Baltimore Raven until the 2009
season.
Ozzie Newsome and Pat Moriarty need hurry these
negotiations up. Joe and Ray are both entering the prime of their careers, and
they deserve to get paid as such. Keeping in mind that I’m not in the least an
NFL salary cap expert, here are the contracts I would give them.
Joe Flacco— 7 years, $94.5 million
Yes, I can already hear you calling me an idiot
for this one, but hear me out. The Ravens need to back-load Flacco’s contract
and give him a “holy sh*t”-sized signing bonus. They shouldn’t be worried about
dropping serious guaranteed money on him because, number one, he’s done nothing
but progress as a quarterback since day one (the topic for another day) and
number two, and more importantly, he hasn’t missed a single regular-season or
postseason game in his entire career. Usually the concern with giving players guaranteed
money is that they get hurt and you end up spending money without getting
production.
The other reason you give Flacco that type of
contract is that if you structure it so he’s making between $6 and $9 million
in the first few years, your salary cap won’t reflect that his salary averages
to 13.5 million per year, which is what Joe thinks he’s worth. Everybody wins.
(Flacco may actually end up getting a contract
bigger than the one I just suggested; look at the insane amount of money that
the Giants gave Eli Manning a few years ago when the entire sports world was
still on the fence about how good he actually was.)
Ray Rice— 6 years, $64.5 million
I actually feel like I’m slighting Ray a little
bit with that contract. The kid is 25 years old and doesn’t warrant the type of
caution teams are generally taking with RBs. He’s not a typical feature-back in
that they don’t run him up the middle, in between the tackles all game; he’s a legitimate threat as a receiver, hauling
in more passes last year than any of our WRs; and his body type and dedication
to working out suggest he won’t have nagging injury concerns like some of the
heavier, bruising backs or smaller, scat-backs.
Just for kicks, here is a comparison of Ray
Rice’s totals from his first four years compared to Marshall Faulk’s totals
from his first four years (Note: Marshall Faulk was a full-time starter as a
rookie):
Rushing Yards—
Faulk: 4,001
Rice: 4,377
Rushing Touchdowns—
Faulk: 36
Rice: 24
Receiving Yards—
Faulk: 1,896
Rice: 2,235
Receiving Touchdowns—
Faulk: 5
Rice: 5
(Note: in the three years Rice has been the
feature back—2009-2011—he’s recorded 29 rushing and receiving TDs; in Faulk’s
first three as the starter, he recorded 29 rushing and receiving TDs.)
Total Yards from Scrimmage—
Faulk: 5,897
Rice: 6,612
Fumbles Lost—
Faulk: 13
Rice: 6
I think Ray and Joe are worth every penny. Making
a monetary, long-term commitment to both of them is tantamount to making a
long-term commitment to winning.
Finally, the sooner we can get these deals
finalized, the sooner we free up legitimate salary cap space to go after
remaining free agents and fill the holes we still have after the draft (which will be next
week’s article, in case our 7 dedicated readers were curious).
Good Insight. Good Research. Good Stats. Good Points. Great Article.
ReplyDeleteThe big money in sports really has me conflicted. On one hand, we have lost the hometown heroes of the past, the men that played for very little money, and lived and worked in their adopted communities. On the other hand, the players of today help generate enormous revenues, and in light of that, should be rewarded accordingly. In the end, it is the consumer that pays, and if that willingness continues, then the owners, players and the league are simply getting a fair return on their respective investments.
ReplyDelete